Gigabyte X38-DS5 review & X38T-DQ6 revisit

November 6, 2007 | 13:43

Tags: #analysis #benchmark #crossfire #ddr2 #ds5 #ga #heatpipes #motherboard #overclocking #review #testing #x38

Companies: #ati #gigabyte #intel

Gaming Platform Performance:


World in Conflict

1280x1024, 0xAF, 0xAA, Medium Details

  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - 7900 GTX
  • Asus Maximus Formula - 7900 GTX
  • Abit IP35 Pro - 7900 GTX
  • 48
  • 45
  • 48
  • 46
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frames Per Second - higher is better

Call of Duty 2

1280x1024, 0xAF, 0xAA, High Details

  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - X1900 CF
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - X1900 CF
  • Asus Maximus Formula - 7900 GTX
  • Asus Maximus Formula - X1900 CF
  • Abit IP35 Pro - 7900 GTX
  • Abit IP35 Pro - X1900 CF
  • 64.5
  • 135.4
  • 65.0
  • 137.6
  • 64.5
  • 126.1
  • 64.2
  • 71.5
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Frames Per Second - higher is better

Team Fortress 2

1280x1024 0xAA 16xAF, Maximum Detail

  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - X1900 CF
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - X1900 CF
  • Asus Maximus Formula - 7900 GTX
  • Asus Maximus Formula - X1900 CF
  • Abit IP35 Pro - 7900 GTX
  • Abit IP35 Pro - X1900 CF
  • 84.4
  • 109.0
  • 84.0
  • 115.8
  • 85.1
  • 114.1
  • 79.8
  • 117.2
0
25
50
75
100
125
Frames Per Second - higher is better

Enemy Territory: Quake Wars

1280x1024, 0xAF, 0xAA, Ultra High Details

  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - X1900 CF
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - X1900 CF
  • Asus Maximus Formula - 7900 GTX
  • Asus Maximus Formula - X1900 CF
  • Abit IP35 Pro - 7900 GTX
  • Abit IP35 Pro - X1900 CF
  • 73.9
  • 92.9
  • 74.6
  • 94.5
  • 73.1
  • 93.0
  • 72.6
  • 81.6
0
25
50
75
100
Frames Per Second - higher is better

Performance on Gigabyte's boards is very good, if a little sporadic at times. It performs slightly better in Call of Duty 2 and World In Conflict, and is also consistently fast in Enemy Territory: Quake Wars, but falls slightly short in Team Fortress 2. TF2 is more CPU and memory dependent, so that could be a reason for the DS5 dropping a few FPS with CrossFire enabled, but it's still just as fast with a single card.

Overall, the X38 chipset is faster in CoD2 and ET:QW by offering up more bandwidth from the dual X16s than the x16/x4 on the P35. We couldn't get World in Conflict to finish the timedemo on any of the boards we tested it with when we ran X1900s in CrossFire using the latest Catalyst 7.10 drivers, it simply crashed out all the time. Using a single card or without enabling CrossFire the test was fine however. We also tried a pair of HD2600 Pros using internal CrossFire (not old external dongle types) and found the problem persisted.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04